The political, historical, and civilizational significance of the captureof Constantinople by the Turks (according to Western sources)

Research article

Views: 39 / PDF downloads: 25

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-129X-2025-152-3-7-28

Keywords:

Constantinople 1453, Ottoman Empire, Byzantium, Istanbul, Culture, Civilization
Download Download PDF

Abstract

There have been many major global political processes and historical events in the history of mankind that have changed the course of development of the largest civilizations. One of these events was the capture of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453 and the fall of the Byzantine Empire, which was considered the gateway between the medieval West and the East. The military actions for the capture of Constantinople began on April 6, 1453 and ended on May 29 with the capture of the city by the Ottoman army. The capture of Constantinople marked the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire and the end of an era in the history of culture and civilization. Therefore, this topic is always considered relevant. The capture of Constantinople, the capital of Byzantium, a major center of world culture and civilization, by the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II on May 29, 1453 marked the beginning of a new historical period in this geography. Although the capture of the city was the result of a military war, its historical and civilizational significance was enormous. Over the years, various theories and scientific concepts have been formed in historical science regarding the capture of Constantinople and the fall of Byzantium. One of the most important events has been described as "the brutal destruction of the city by the Turks and the destruction of the Byzantine culture and civilization that had developed over thousands of years." However, new concepts and theories are currently emerging in historical science that move away from such biased views and positions and become the basis for writing true history. New research now shows that there was interaction between the Turks and Byzantine rulers on the eve of the capture of Constantinople by the Turks and the fall of the Byzantine Empire, the reasons for which are explained by various factors. One important reason for this is that the Turks repeatedly defended Byzantium from outside forces. Although the Turks captured Constantinople, Western historians describe it as a protector of the Christian peoples that were formerly part of Byzantium from outside forces. The article examines the political, historical, cultural and civilizational significance of the capture of Constantinople by the Turks based on Western sources. The prerequisites and reasons for the fall of Byzantium, as well as its course and results, are considered from a cultural point of view. The works of medieval European chroniclers and humanists contain valuable historical information about the fall of the city and the fate of Byzantium. A new scientific analysis of the findings of modern European historians and scholars working on this problem is carried out, and on this basis the historical, cultural and civilizational significance of the topic will be revealed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • N. Abdukadyrov, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

    Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of World History, Historiography and Source Studies

  • А. Shokatova, A.K. Kusainov Eurasian Humanitarian Institute, Astana, Kazakhstan

    Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedagogy and History

References

Babinger F. Mehmed the Conqueror and his time. transl. by R. Manheim. Princeton. 1978. 549 p. (in English)

Balivet M. Byzantins et Ottomans: relations, interactions, succession. Istanbul. 1999. 278 p. (in English)

Chalkokondyles L. Translation and Commentary of the «Demonstrations of Histories» (Books I-III). Athens. 1996. 391 p. (in English)

Coles P. The Ottoman empire on Europe. London. 1986. 216 р. (in English)

Crowley R. Constantinople. The last great siege 1453. London: Faber and Faber. 2005. 304 p. (in English)

De Clari Robert The Conquest of Constantinople. Medieval Academy of America University of Toronto Press. 1996. 150 р. (in English)

Doukas. Decline and Fall of Byzantium to the Ottoman Turks. Transl. by H. Magoulias. Detroit. 1975. 346 p. (in English)

Grecu V. Critobul din Imbros din domnia lui Mahomed al Il-lea anii 1451-1467. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romine. 1963. 377 р. (in Romanian)

Flavio B. Scritti inediti e rari di Biondi Flavio. Roma: Tipografia poliglotta Vaticana. 1927. 282 р. (in Italiano)

Іorga N. Byzantium after Byzantium. Romanian Institute of International Studies. Iaşi ‒ Oxford – Portland. 2000. 256 р. (in English)

İnalcık H. Kuruluş ve imparatorluk süresinde Osmanlı. İstanbul. Timaş yayınları. 2011. 304 р. (in Turkish)

Inalcik H. Mehmed the Conqueror (1432–1481) and His Time. Speculum. 1960. Vol.35, nо.3, рр.408-427. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2849734

Kinross Lord. Osmanlı imparatorluğunun yükselişi ve çöküşü. Transl. from English Meral Gaspıralı İstanbul: Altın kitaplar. 2009. 656 р. (in Turkish)

Korobeinikov D. Byzantium and the Turks in the Thirteenth Century. Oxford. 2014. 372 p. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198708261.001.0001

Kritovoulos. History of Mehmed the Conqueror. Translated from the Greek by Charles T. Riggs. Princeton University Press. 1954. 222 р. (in English)

Lewis B. What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response. Published by Oxford University Press. 2002. 177 p. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195144208.001.0001

Lowry H. «From Lesser Wars to the Mightiest War»: The Ottoman Conquest and Transformation of Byzantine Urban Сenters in the Fifteenth Century. Continuity and Change in Late Byzantine and Early Ottoman Society. Birmingham. 1986. Pр.323-338. (in English)

Mertens D. Europaische Friede und Turkenkrieg im Spatmittelalter. Zwischenstaatliche Friedenswahrung in Mittelalter und Friiher Neuzeit. Hrsg. von H. Durchhardt. Koln-Wien. 1991. Рр.45-73. (in German)

Monfasani J. Lauro Quirini and His Greek Manuscripts: Some Notes on His Culture. Et Amicorum: Essays on Renaissance Humanism and Philosophy. Series: Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, 1977. Vol.273, pp.33-46. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355323_004

Necipoğlu N. Byzantium between the Ottomans and the Latins: Politics and Society in the Late Empire. Cambridge. 2009. 350 p. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576720

Nicol D. The End of the Byzantine Empire. London: Holmes & Meier Publishers Incorporated. 1980. 109 р. (in English)

Nicolò B. Giornale dell'assedio di Costantinopoli, 1453. Enrico Cornet. Vienna: Tendler. 1856. 82 p. (in Italiano)

Obolensky D. Byzantium and the Slavs. Saint Vladimir's Seminary Press. 1994. 323 р. (in English)

Sallabi Ali Muhammed. Osmanlı tarihi. Kuruluşu – Yükselişi ve çöküşü. İstanbul: Ravza yayınları. 2007. 735 s. (in Turkish)

Shukurov R. Byzantine Turks, 1204-1461. Leiden, Boston. 2016. 513 p. (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004307759

Silvio Enea P. Opera quae extant omnia. Minerva.1967. 1086 р. (in latino)

Sphrantzes G. The Chronicle (1401-1477). transl. by M. Philippides. The Fall of the Byzantine Empire. Amherst. 1980. 174 p. (in English)

Runciman S. The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge University Press. 1965. 256 p. (in English)

Vryonis S. Nomadization and Islamization in Asia Minor. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 1975. Vol.29, pp.43-71 (in English) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1291369

Vryonis S. The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor: And the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh Through the Fifteenth Century. University of California Press. 1971. 532 p. (in English)

Zachariadou E. Religious Dialogue between Byzantines and Turks during the Ottoman Expansion. Studies in pre-Ottoman Turkey and the Ottomans. Aldershot. 2007. Pр.289-304 (in English)

Vizantiiskie istoriki o padenii Konstantinopolia v 1453 godu. Pod red. Ia. Liubarskogo, T. Sobol. St. Petersburg: Alethea. 2006. 192 p. (in Russian).

Levchenko M. Zavoevanie turkami Konstantinopolia v 1453 g. i istoricheskie posledstviia etogo sobytiia. The Byzantine Chronicle. 1953. Vol.VII(32), pp.3-8. (in Russian).

Pashkin N. Padenie Konstantinopolia v vospriiatii zapadnykh gumanistov XV v. Antichnaia drevnost i srednie veka. Yekaterinburg: Ural Publishing House. The university. 2008. Issue 38. Рp.258-266. (in Russian).

Pogodin P. Obzor istochnikov po istorii osady i vziatiia Vizantii turkami v 1453 godu. Moscow: Ripol Classic. 2013. 62 р. (in Russian).

Ryazanov P., Loshkareva M. Osmanskoe zavoevanie Konstantinopolia v angliiskikh khronikakh Vtoroi poloviny XV – nachala XVI veka The Middle Ages. 2023. Vol.84, no.3, pp.129-146 (in Russian).

Speransky M. Povesti i skazaniia o vziatii Tsargrada turkami (1453) v russkoi pismennosti XVI-XVII vv. Trudý Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury. Moscow-Leningrad. 1954. Vol.12, pp.188-223. (in Russian).

Udaltsova Z. Osnovnye prichiny padeniia Vizantii i posledstviia turetskogo zavoevaniia. Istoriia Vizantii: 3-kh tomakh. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House. 1967. Vol.3. Рр.207-218. (in Russian)

Udaltsova Z. Otkliki na zavoevanie Konstantinopolia turkami v russkom gosudarstve. The Byzantine Time Period. 1977. Vol.38(63), pp.19-29. (in Russian)

Uspensky F. Dvizhenie narodov iz Tsentralnoi Azii v Evropu. I: Turki; II: Mongoly. The Byzantine Chronicle. 1947. Vol.I(XXVI). Рp.9-28. (in Russian)

Florya B. Sobytiia istorii pozdnei Vizantii na stranitsakh rus. ist. tekstov XV-XVI vv. Slavic studies. 2017. No.4, pp.12-20. (in Russian).

Published

2025-08-30