ЕDITORIAL POLICY

DOWNLOAD PDF

About the Journal

The Gumilyov Journal of History is an international, peer–reviewed scientific and historical journal that is open to all readers. The journal's stated mission is to become a leading creative hub promoting discussion and research, on all aspects of the history of Kazakhstan (Domestic History) and Eurasia in a broad sense, from the eastern to western margins. The journal welcomes articles that place these regions in a global context (World History). The journal was initially published until December 31, 2024, under the title “Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Series: Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religious Studies”, and the journal's first issue was released in 1995.

The journal was established Non-profit joint-stock company “L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University”, a leading scientific and educational institution in Central Asia that has made significant contributions to advancing academic science, interdisciplinary research, and disseminating scientific knowledge. The university, named after the great Eurasian thinker Lev Nikolaevich Gumilyov, upholds the traditions of in–depth historical analysis by integrating interdisciplinary research methods, scientific support, a solid methodological foundation, and access to extensive academic resources.

The mission and objectives of the journal are to unite scholars working on relevant regional thematic areas, such as archaeology, historiography, source studies, ethnography, and ethnology, providing a platform to present the best theoretical, empirical, and analytical scientific works dedicated to the history of Kazakhstan and the Eurasian continent. The journal's brand is built upon an interdisciplinary and cross–sectoral synthesis, bringing together unique thematic areas in the study of history.

The Gumilyov Journal of History is intended for professional historians, researchers, educators, graduate students, and undergraduates interested in historical processes within the Eurasia and beyond. The journal publishes original research articles, review papers, book reviews, archival studies, and analytical materials.

The journal considers all manuscripts under the strict condition that the manuscript is the author's original work and does not duplicate any previously published works, including the author’s own prior publications. 

Founder and Publisher: Non-profit joint-stock company L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University 

Certificate of re-registration of a periodical and/or information agency №KZ41VPY00111229, issued on January 31, 2025, by the Information Committee of the Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

ISSN (Print) 3080–129Х

ISSN (Online) 3080-6860

The publication has been in circulation since 2025.

Publication frequency: 4 times a year (March, June, September, December).

The journal publishes articles in Kazakh, English, and Russian languages.

It is included in the list of journals recommended by the Science and Higher Education Quality Assurance Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Open Access Policy

The journal provides instant open access to its content based on the principle that making research freely available to the public facilitates greater global knowledge sharing.

Licensing: available under a Creative Commons "Attribution–Non Commercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International" license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by–nc–nd/4.0/

CC BY–NC–ND includes the following elements:

  • BY: Attribution – You must attribute proper attribution, provide a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made. You may do this in any reasonable way, but not in a way that implies that the licensor approves of you or your use;
  • NC: Non–Commercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes, only non–commercial use of the work is permitted;
  • ND: NoDerivatives – If you remix, transform, or augmentthe material, you may not distribute the modified material, no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted, and no modification the article.

 

Copyright

The editorial board of the Gumilyov Journal of History adheres to the copyright laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan and relevant international agreements.

Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following:

  • Authors retain the right to distribute their work in accordance with the journal’s self–archiving policy (see details).
  • Authors may post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) before and during the review process, as this can foster productive discussions and increase citations (see The Effect of Open Access).
  • The published work will be made available in print and electronic formats, either by subscription or under an open–access model licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY–NC–ND 4.0), at the publisher’s discretion or in accordance with a separate agreement between the publisher and the authors.

Manuscripts submitted by authors are considered for publication only upon the decision of the editorial board and the editor–in–chief. In making their decisions, the editorial board and editor–in–chief rely on reviewers’ evaluations obtained during the peer–review process. More details about the review procedure can be found here https://jhistory.enu.kz/index.php/jHistory/article_review_procedure.

By granting the publisher an exclusive license, authors allow the publisher to use their work in the following ways:

  • Reproducing the article or its parts, as well as metadata in Kazakh, Russian, and English, in any material form, including print and electronic formats, either as a standalone work or within journals and/or databases (local or online) of the publisher or other entities, at the publisher's discretion.
  • Distributing the article or its parts, as well as metadata in Kazakh, Russian, and English, on any medium, either within the journal and/or databases of the publisher or other entities, or as a standalone work worldwide, under either an open–access or subscription–based model, without compensation to the author.
  • Making the article or its parts, as well as metadata in Kazakh, Russian, and English, publicly available so that any person can access it from any location and at any time of their choice (including via the Internet).
  • Granting permission for third parties to use the article or its parts, as well as metadata in Kazakh, Russian, and English, with prior author notification via information posted on the journal’s website, without compensation to the author.
  • Retaining all rights not explicitly transferred to the publisher under this agreement, including patent rights for any processes, methods, or techniques described in the article, as well as trademark rights.

Archiving and Depositing

The publishing system of the Gumilyov Journal of History is configured for electronic backup and content preservation through the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), this ensures the long–term storage of the journal’s complete archives and enables the automatic recovery of any damaged information.

In accordance with Article 16 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Mass Media” No. 451–I of July 23, 1999, titled “Mandatory Copies of Periodicals and Storage of Television and Radio Program Materials”, the media owner submits mandatory copies of the journal to

the National Libraries of the Republic of Kazakhstan

the National State Book Chamber of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Electronic versions of the journal are stored in:

The Electronic Library Fund of the National Center of Science and Technology Evaluation (hereinafter referred to as JSC “NCSTE”).

The Electronic Archive of the Ministry of Culture and Information (MCI),

in accordance with the Rules for the Formation of the Electronic Archive of Mandatory Free Copies of Periodical Print Publications of the Republic of Kazakhstan, approved on October 24, 2024 (Order No. 495–NK).

Self–Archiving by Authors

The journal adheres to the policy of Open Access and “Free Self–Archiving” policy.

Terms and Definitions

We use the following terms and concepts:

‒ Preprint: An early version of a manuscript (draft) before submission to the journal for review.

‒ Review Version: A manuscript version that has been accepted for review by the editorial board and sent to reviewers for evaluation (under peer review).

‒ Accepted Version: A manuscript version accepted for publication by the editorial board and the editor–in–chief. This version includes all author revisions after peer review but still requires further literary and academic editing, formatting, typesetting, and proofreading by the publisher.

‒ Final Version: The officially published version of the article as part of a journal issue. Articles published in the Online First format are not considered final versions—they are accepted versions made available before typesetting. The final version may include post–publication corrections.

‒ Personal Page: A webpage created by the author that contains information about their research and is hosted on non–commercial platforms (e.g., a university or research organization website). User profile pages on commercial platforms (e.g., ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Facebook, LinkedIn, VKontakte, and other social networks) are not considered personal pages.

‒ Institutional Repository: A collection of web pages hosted by educational or research organizations for non–commercial purposes to showcase their scientific contributions and provide access to research outputs.

‒ Thematic Repository: A collection of web pages hosted by educational or research organizations for non–commercial purposes, focusing on a specific research topic or field.

‒ Commercial and Non–Commercial: Commercial activity is defined as any activity that is directly or indirectly aimed at obtaining financial gain. When determining whether actions or intentions are classified as commercial or non–commercial, we focus on the nature of the actions rather than the status of the organization.

 

What Can Be Self–Archived and When?

 

Personal Page

Institutional Repository

Non–Profit Subject Repository (including PubMed Central)

Commercial Repository or Social Network (e.g., ResearchGate, Academia.edu, SSRN)

Preprint Review Version

At any time

Accepted version of the article for publication

After official notification from the editors about the acceptance of the article for publication

Accepted Version

After the article is published as part of the issue on the journal's website

Compliance with Plan S

Our self–archiving policy (Platinum Open Access) complies with all provisions of Plan S, and the terms of the author’s publication agreement are fully compatible with agreements between cOAlition S funders and grant recipients/authors.

Creative Commons and Other Licenses

Authors may publish (self–archive) preprints and manuscripts under review under any license of their choice. We recommend Creative Commons CC–BY or any other license from the Creative Commons family.

Accepted versions of articles may be published under an open Creative Commons CC–BY–NC–ND license or its equivalent, but not under a more permissive license. We do not allow accepted versions of articles to be published under licenses as permissive as Creative Commons CC–BY.

Third–Party Materials

Before online publication (self–archiving), authors must ensure that they have all necessary rights and permissions for all components of the article. When publishing (self–archiving) an article under a Creative Commons license, the author must hold the rights to all borrowed elements included in the article.

Rights holders of third–party materials must be explicitly acknowledged, along with a statement indicating that the use of these materials without separate permission is not allowed.

Closed Repositories and Embargo Period

Articles may be deposited in closed repositories both before and after official publication on the journal's website. A closed repository is defined as one where only repository administrators have access to the content.

Article metadata (titles, abstracts, author information, and links) may be made publicly available before and after the article is published in an issue on the journal's website. Full texts of final versions may be made available on external sites but must include a mandatory link to the journal publication (including via DOI).

Content Placement in Repositories

The journal’s editorial board allows and even encourages authors to deposit accepted versions and/or preprint versions of their articles on their web pages, institutional websites, and public repositories (such as ResearchGate or medRxiv.org). After publication, the editorial board requires that authors include a link to the final version of the article on the journal’s website.

When depositing articles in external repositories, authors must include the following information:

  • If the article has not yet been published, a clear statement that the manuscript has been accepted for publication or submitted for review, along with a link to the journal’s website.
  • For all published articles, a link to the final version of the article on the journal's website (including via DOI).
  • A clear statement regarding the license conditions under which the published version of the article is made available.

Example Statements for Repository Deposits:

  • This article was published in Gumilyov Journal of History [https://doi.org/XXX]. This version is freely available for viewing and download for personal, non–commercial use only. This publication may be used for distribution and other non–commercial purposes without creating derivative works on other platforms. © Rights holder.
  • This article was published in Gumilyov Journal of History [https://doi.org/XXX]. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC BY–NC–ND Distribution or use of this version of the article for commercial purposes is prohibited. Derivative works may not be distributed. © Rights holder.

Citation of Articles in Repositories

When citing an accepted version of an article or an earlier version, we ask readers and authors to provide a reference to the final version of the article and to use the DOI.

Publication ethics

The ethical requirements of the Gumilyov Journal of History are based on the principles of publication ethics accepted by the international community, reflected, in particular, in the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics COPE and the Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK) of Elsevier.

The Editorial Board and the International Advisory Board of the Journal strictly adhere to ethical standards in their own activities and in their relations with all participants of the publication process: authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, distributors and readers. The following is a list of ethical standards to be followed by authors, reviewers and editors involved in the publication of research results.

The publisher bears responsibility for preventing violations of publication ethics, including but not limited to the following practices:

  • Author-provided peer reviews and contractual or pseudo-reviewing: Requiring authors to submit reviews of their own manuscripts or engaging in simulated peer review arrangements implies the absence of genuine editorial evaluation and undermines the integrity of the journal.
  • Provision of intermediary services: Offering agency-based assistance such as “turnkey publication,” correspondence with the editorial office on behalf of the author, revision of manuscripts by agents based on reviewer comments, or preparation of paid reviews constitutes unethical editorial conduct.
  • Sale or gifting of authorship and manipulation of author lists: Including individuals as co-authors who have not made an intellectual contribution to the research violates authorship rights and ethical standards. Such practices mislead readers and are considered fraudulent.
  • Publication of materials from remote or informal “scientific” conferences: These events are often associated with academic misconduct and deception. Publishing their proceedings promotes the dissemination of pseudoscientific content and is deemed unethical.
  • Submission of manuscripts to other journals without author consent: Publishing an article in a journal not approved by the author infringes upon the author’s rights and interests.
  • Disclosure of author materials to third parties: Sharing submitted manuscripts with individuals outside the editorial team and peer reviewers breaches confidentiality and violates the principles of editorial ethics and copyright.
  • Citation manipulation: Artificial inflation of bibliometric indicators through excessive self-citation, reciprocal citation, or irrelevant referencing misleads readers and constitutes a form of academic fraud.
  • Plagiarism, data falsification, and fabrication: The editorial board is committed to ensuring the integrity of published research by preventing the dissemination of unethical scientific content involving plagiarism, falsified data, or fabricated findings.

 

We draw your attention to the basic principles of professional ethics:

Ethics of authors of scientific publications

  • The authors guarantee that the manuscript submitted for publication in the Gumilyov Journal of History is an original manuscript written in one of the languages of the journal.
  • Authors should not submit to the journal an article that has been sent to another journal and is under review, nor should they submit an article that has already been published in another journal. Submitting an article to more than one journal at the same time is unethical behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript simultaneously to another journal (journals) is perceived as unethical behavior and provides grounds for withdrawal of the article from consideration. Confirmation that the material has not been previously published and is not under consideration in another journal is recorded in the agreement with the author;
  • Excessive borrowing, as well as plagiarism in any form, including unattributed quotations, paraphrasing, or appropriating the rights to the results of others' research, is unethical and unacceptable;
  • The author (or team of authors) realizes that he/she bears initial responsibility for the novelty and reliability of the results of scientific research.
  • The authors of the article must present reliable results of the conducted research. Plausibly erroneous or falsified statements are unacceptable.
  • Authors are obliged to indicate in the submitted manuscript the fact of using AI tools, disclose and justify the purpose of application in the manuscript, which according to the Gumilyov Journal of History policy will be included in the published article to ensure transparency and build trust between all participants in the publication process. The final decision on the validity of the application of generative artificial intelligence is made by the editorial board based on the recommendations of the reviewers
  • Authors should disclose the sources of funding for the study (agreement with the author), to prevent possible conflicts;
  • Authors are responsible for obtaining all necessary permissions to publish the materials used in the article. Confirmation of the rights to use materials for publication is fixed in the agreement with the author;
  • The authors ensure that the list of co–authors includes only individuals who have made significant contributions to the study. The final version of the article and its submission for publication must be approved by all co–authors;
  1. The list of authors of the manuscript includes all individuals who made significant contributions to the implementation of the study and interpretation of the data obtained.
  2. If the author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the article at the review stage or after its publication, he or she should notify the journal's editorial board as soon as possible and take joint action to correct them or withdraw the work;
  3. We urge all authors to observe scientific correctness in papers containing criticism of colleagues. Otherwise, the editorial board reserves the right to reject the material or correct its style in agreement with the author.
  4. In the process of reviewing the manuscript, the author is obliged to cooperate with the Editorial Board of the journal, promptly respond to comments and take into account the recommendations of the reviewer. In case of disagreement with the reviewer's assessment, the author sends reasoned objections to the editor. Elimination of remarks and implementation of the reviewer's recommendations should made within a month from the moment of sending the text of the review to the author;
  5. If case of republished, the author should not violate the rights of the Gumilyov Journal of History by indicating the place of the first publication of the material;

Ethics of peer review of scientific publications

– The Editorial Board ensures confidentiality of the review process and informs reviewers about the need to strictly follow the ethical principles of reviewing papers. The review process of submitted materials is confidential. Unpublished materials cannot be used by the Editorial Board, editors or reviewers in their own interests;

– The review process is objective, independent of commercial interests and opportunistic needs. The priority is the scientific value of the research, its content and novelty, compliance with the requirements of scientific ethics;

– Reviewing is carried out anonymously. The reviewer is sent the manuscript without the author's name. In case of negative review, its text is provided to the author of the manuscript, without signature and indication of the reviewer's name, position, place of work. Violation of anonymity is possible only in case of reviewer's statement about unreliability or falsification of materials presented in the manuscript, or the presence of plagiarism.

– The reviewer is obliged to provide an objective, reasoned, substantiated assessment of the materials and research results submitted for publication. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed;

– As a conclusion, the reviewer fills in the review form, which reflects the criteria for evaluation of the manuscript. The final part of the review contains the overall evaluation of the manuscript, comments and recommendations;

– A reviewer who, in his/her opinion, is not qualified to evaluate the manuscript or cannot be objective, must inform the editor;

– After receiving a positive review of the submitted manuscript, the final decision on the feasibility of publication is made by the editorial board.

Ethics of publishing scientific articles

  • The Editorial Board of a scientific journal accepts manuscripts for consideration in accordance with the journal's focus;
  • The main criteria for acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by the Editorial Board are the relevance and scientific significance of the submitted article, its compliance with the subject of the journal, originality of the article and reliability of the data, clarity of presentation of the material, compliance of the article with all the requirements of the journal;
  • The Editorial Board agrees to take reasonable measures to identify and prevent the publication of articles in the research of which inappropriate behavior has been committed has occurred, not to encourage such violation or knowingly allow such violations;
  • The Editorial Board guarantees to make decisions without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious views, origin, nationality, social status or political preferences of the authors;
  • The magazine does not print material that may be considered stolen;
  • The Editorial Board guarantees complete confidentiality in the process of accepting, processing and review of the article. Unpublished materials may not be use or shared with third parties other than reviewers and editorial staff;
  • The Editorial Board is obliged to protect the integrity of published manuscripts, to agree with the author on edits, changes or reduction of the text;
  • The Editorial Board guarantees the consideration of claims regarding the reviewed manuscripts or published materials. If a conflict situation is identified, the necessary measures will be taken to restore the violated rights;
  • The Editorial Board, together with the publisher, guarantees the recognition of errors, upon identification of which corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies will be published (Instructions for withdrawal or correction of articles);
  1. The opinion of the editors are not necessarily those of the authors of the published materials.

Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)

The editors of the Gumilyov Journal of History recognize and support the development of new intelligent technologies in research and development, and the use of tools to improve productivity. The Journal closely observes and records new AI advances in the publishing field. An increasing number of authors are using AI to write scholarly publications, essentially blurring the boundaries between human–generated and machine–generated text, calling into question the content of the Journal's authorship policy.

Authors are required to indicate in the submitted manuscript the fact of using AI tools, disclose and justify the purpose of application in the manuscript, which according of the Gumilyov Journal of History policy will be included in the published article to ensure transparency and build trust between all participants in the publication process. The final decision on the validity of the application of generative artificial intelligence is made by the editorial board based on the recommendations of the reviewers. At the same time, the editorial board emphasizes that it is not allowed to include in the co–authorship of work the names of information systems used in the preparation of the manuscript, including ChatGPT.

Quality control of reviewing

In individual cases, the editorial board may send an article for additional review, including statistical and methodological review. The Editorial Board of the journal conducts an ongoing assessment of the quality of reviewing.

The Editorial Board of the journal expect that the peer review process will help to:

  • – prevent the publication of poor quality articles and weed out studies that were not properly designed and executed;
  • – make sure that the data presented in the article are correct and sufficiently summarised;
  • – check whether the article contains references to previous major works in its field;
  • – make sure that the author's interpretation of the data obtained and the validity of the conclusions are correct;
  • – and, on this basis, decide on the publication of the article and give the authors with recommendations for its improvement (where necessary).

Policy on Advertising

The Editorial Board adheres to ethical standards in its activities and above all upholds the right to editorial independence. Placement of advertising and sponsorship cannot influence in any way editorial decisions regarding the selection of materials for publication and editorial content. The magazine does not publish material to accompany advertisement and does not sell advertising in relation to specific articles. Advertising and informational materials published in the magazine are not mixed with editorial content.

All decisions on the placement of advertising materials are made solely by the Publisher.

The Editorial Board reserves the right not to accept advertising and informational materials, the placement of which does not comply with the publication’s policy.

Article Review Process

  1. The journal’s editorial board reviews all submitted materials within its scope to ensure expert evaluation.
  2. Reviewers include experts from the Editorial Board as well as external specialists—leading scholars in the journal’s field—who hold academic degrees relevant to the article’s subject and have published works on the topic within the last three years.

A reviewer is an expert acting on behalf of the scientific journal or publisher, conducting a scientific assessment of submitted materials to determine their suitability for publication.

  1. The Editor–in–Chief selects the reviewers for each article.
  2. Each article is reviewed by two experts. If necessary, the Editor–in–Chief may assign additional reviewers.
  3. The review process is confidential. Neither the reviewer nor the author is informed of each other’s identity or institutional affiliation (double–blind review). Confidentiality may only be breached if the reviewer reports fraudulent or inaccurate data in the manuscript.
  4. The review period is determined on a case–by–case basis to ensure timely publication, but it should not exceed one month.
  5. The review must address the following aspects:
  6. a) The article’s relevance to its stated topic.
  7. b) Alignment with contemporary scientific advancements.

c ) Readability in terms of language, style, structure, and clarity of tables, diagrams, illustrations, and formulas.

  1. d) The necessity of publication, considering prior works in the field.
  2. e) The article’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as required revisions or additions.
  3. Based on their evaluation, the reviewer provides one of the following recommendations (with justification):
    • The article is recommended for publication
    • The article is recommended for publication after minor revisions.
    • The article requires additional review by another expert.
    • The article is not suitable for publication.
  1. If revisions are required, the editorial board sends the review to the author with a request to address the comments or provide a reasoned rebuttal. The revised manuscript undergoes a second round of review.
  2. If the authors choose not to revise their manuscript, they must notify the editorial board of their decision to withdraw the article. If the revised manuscript is not submitted within one month of receiving the review, and the authors do not formally withdraw it, the editorial board will remove it from consideration and notify the authors accordingly.
  3. If unresolved disagreements arise between the author and reviewers, the editorial board may assign an additional review. In such cases, the Editor–in–Chief makes the final decision during an editorial board meeting.
  4. The editorial board decides on acceptance or rejection based on the reviewers’ recommendations.
  5. A positive review does not guarantee publication. The final decision is made by the editorial board and recorded in meeting minutes. Articles rejected by the editorial board will not be reconsidered. Grounds for rejection include:
  • The manuscript does not align with the journal’s scope.
  • The manuscript does not meet submission requirements.
  • Negative expert reviews.
  • An editorial board decision, documented in meeting minutes.
  • Ethical violations by the author.
  1. The editorial board notifies authors of acceptance or rejection via email or through the journal’s submission system.
  2. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for five years.

Author Guidelines  EditEdit Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist EditEdit Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Article Submission Process

  1. Manuscript Submission

Authors must submit their manuscripts through the journal’s website: https://jhistory.enu.kz/ . To publish an article, authors must register on the website and adhere to the manuscript formatting guidelines, which require the following:

  • A complete manuscript with full author identification, formatted according to the author guidelines(link).
  • An anonymized version of the manuscript, with all identifying author information removed.
  • A cover letter (commitment) signed by all authors in the order they appear in the manuscript, including the corresponding author’s details.

Manuscripts must be submitted via the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform, which allows authors to track their submission from initial submission to publication.

  1. Technical Review and Plagiarism Check

All manuscripts undergo a plagiarism check using the “Antiplagiat VUZ” system, employed by the publisher to ensure academic and research integrity.

  • The minimum originality threshold is 80%. Manuscripts that fail to meet this requirement or contain plagiarism, uncredited borrowings, or unauthorized use of others’ work will be rejected.
  • Editors review manuscripts for compliance with formatting guidelines and journal scope.
  • Authors receive confirmation of manuscript submission within seven days, along with a notification regarding compliance with journal requirements.
  • If revisions are required, authors must submit a revised version or formally withdraw their submission. If no revision is submitted within one month, the manuscript will be removed from consideration.
  1. Peer Review Process
  • The Editorial Board notifies authors of the review outcome within one month.
  • If revisions are recommended, the editorial team provides a review reportto the author, who must either address the comments or provide a reasoned rebuttal. The revised manuscript is then re–evaluated.
  • Authors who choose not to revise their manuscript must inform the editorial board. If no revised version is submitted within one month, the manuscript will be withdrawn from the review process.
  1. Article Acceptance for Publication

The decision to publish is based on: Adherence to submission guidelines. Positive peer reviews.

  • Approval from the editorial board and the Editor–in–Chief. Authors will receive a formal acceptance or rejection notification.

Online First — accepted articles are published on the website with full citation details, assigned DOI, and registered in the Crossref database (DOI remains unchanged after publication). A pre-publication version of the article is available for download in PDF format. Readers can access the article in the "Accepted for Publication" section of the website, and authors can reference it as part of their scientific work in official reports, just like a final published article.

  1. Processing and Review Fees

Upon acceptance, authors must pay the processing and review fee within five business days (payment details are available on the journal’s website).

  1. Proofreading and Finalization
  • The editorial team may perform scientific and stylistic editing, subject to author approval.
  • Authors must submit a signed license agreementvia the journal’s system after the final proofreading stage.
  • The official submission dateis considered the date the editor accepts the final version for publication.
  • The journal publishes no more than one article by the same author (whether individually or in co-authorship) within a single calendar year.

Author Payments

Article Processing Charge

The journal’s policy, aligned with international standards of research ethics, does not charge any publication fees.

The editorial board does not charge authors a processing fee if their manuscripts are rejected following reviewers’ recommendations. In such cases, the editorial office bears the costs associated with a range of editorial services, including manuscript receipt and registration, initial assessment for compliance with the journal’s requirements, reviewer search, and communication of review results to authors.

The manuscript processing and review fee set by the journal is not intended as a source of profit. All funds received from authors are used exclusively to cover editorial and publishing expenses. These include ensuring high publication quality standards, technical preparation of materials, support for the peer review process, as well as administrative and organizational costs related to publishing scholarly content.

Thus, the established fee is aimed at ensuring the sustainable operation of the journal and improving the quality of scientific publications.

The editorial board provides fee waivers for international authors. If all co–authors of a manuscript are citizens of foreign countries, no processing fee is charged. This policy is intended to foster international scientific collaboration, create favorable conditions for foreign researchers, and encourage their publication activity. If the manuscript is co–authored by both foreign and Kazakhstani researchers, the processing fee is calculated proportionally based on the number of fee–exempt and fee–applicable co–authors.

The editorial board works directly with authors and does not engage intermediaries. If any companies or individuals offer to publish your article in our journal for a fee as intermediaries, please note that such offers are illegal. We kindly ask that you report such violations to us at: gj.history@enu.kz

In cases where the processing fee is not paid, the final version prepared for publication will be discarded, and the original manuscript returned to the author(s). In such cases, publication is not possible, and the editorial office assumes the processing costs.

Publication Fees

  1. For staff/students of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University – 2,000 KZT per page (electronic version only), 2,500 KZT per page (electronic and print versions),
  • For contributors from external organizations – 2,500 KZT per page (electronic version only), 3,000 KZT per page (electronic and print versions).
  • International authors (without co–authors from Kazakhstan) can publish free of charge.

Note: Article layout is carried out in accordance with principles of efficiency and quality. This service is not intended for profit, but solely for ensuring the standardized preparation of materials for publication.

Payment Details: NAO "L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University",

BIN 010140003594

  1. JSC "Bank CenterCredit" Bank BIC: KCJBKZKX, IBAN: KZ978562203105747338 KBE 16, KNP 859 – for article payment
  2. JSC "Bank RBK" Bank BIC: KINCKZKA IBAN: KZ498210439858161073, KBE 16, KNP 859 – for article payment
  3. Payments can also be made via the Kaspi.kz app or QR code. Open the Kaspi.kz mobile application.

 

  1. In the application, you need to select "Payments", Education > Additional Education > Select an organization (ENU Bulletin)
  2. Full name of the author
  3. Author's IIN
  4. Select a magazine series (from the list)
  5. Amount

Guidelines for Article Retraction or Correction

In accordance with the recommendations of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers, retraction is recognized as a mechanism for correcting published information and informing readers when a publication contains serious flaws or erroneous data that cannot be trusted.

Members of the editorial board are responsible for ensuring the ethical integrity of published articles. This includes identifying and addressing clear signs of unethical behavior, such as plagiarism, self–plagiarism, excessive self–citation, and conflicts of interest. If a violation of publication and/or research ethics is detected in an article, the journal’s scientific editor, based on the decision of the editorial board, must initiate the retraction process. Articles may be withdrawn either by the author(s) or by the journal’s editorial team. The editorial office carries out retractions in cases of publication and/or research ethics violations, adhering to COPE guidelines.

An article is subject to withdrawal/retraction if:

  • There is clear evidence that the data obtained is unreliable or was acquired through unethical practices, such as data falsification.
  • The manuscript was previously published in another journal before appearing in the Gumilyov Journal of History.
  • Plagiarism is detected, including unauthorized use of images, graphs, tables, or other content. • The article contains significant errors that could negatively impact other researchers and their work, such as miscalculations or experimental mistakes.
  • Copyright claims arise from third parties regarding the article or its individual components.
  • The article contains information that contradicts the principles, standards, and norms of publication and/or research ethics.

In such cases, the journal’s editorial board conducts a thorough review. If retraction is warranted, a formal retraction report is prepared, confirmed, and signed by the scientific editor. A copy of this report is sent to the corresponding author.

Following retraction, the article is marked as retracted on the journal’s website, with the reasons for retraction clearly specified. The editorial office also publishes a retraction notice on the journal’s main page and includes details of the retracted article in the next issue.

The journal’s editorial team carefully, objectively, and thoroughly reviews all substantiated reports of ethical violations in published articles. The editorial office expects authors and reviewers to promptly inform the editorial team of any errors or violations they discover after publication.

Author Guidelines

1.Manuscript Length:

  • A full manuscript of a research article should not exceed 60,000 characters (including spaces). This includes abstracts and keywords in three languages, the reference list, figure captions, and author information.
  • Reviews, book reviews, and biographical articles should be up to 20,000 characters (including spaces).

Manuscripts exceeding the specified length may be accepted with editorial approval if the author justifies the necessity. The final decision is made by the editorial board based on the reviewer’s recommendation. 

  1. Manuscript Formatting: Font: Times New Roman, size 14, single line spacing. Indentation: 1. File format: .doc or .docx. Margins: 2*2*2*2 cm. Text alignment: justified. All unnecessary spaces and line breaks should be removed using the "Find and Replace" function.
  2. Manuscript Structure: The manuscript should follow a logical structure close to the following: Introduction, Methods and Materials, Literature Review, Results, Discussions, Conclusions. These section titles should be italicized. Reviews, book reviews, and biographical articles may deviate from this structure.
  3. Rules for In-text Citations

References to literature are given in round brackets, indicating the author’s surname without initials (except in cases of homonyms) or a shortened title (if the publication has no author), the year of publication separated by a comma; reference to a page, figure, etc.

Examples: (Abzhanov 2020: 36) – reference to a page (Kozybaev M.K. 1988) – author with initials to distinguish from homonym (Kozybaev I.M. 2022: 35) – another author with the same surname (Istoriya Kazakhstana 2015: 120) – if no author, use the title (Smith 2019; Johnson 2021: 45) – multiple sources in one bracket

4.1. Rules for Bibliographic Descriptions

Kazakh-language and Russian-language sources are difficult to identify for foreign specialists; therefore, in bibliographic descriptions the original title of the source must be italicized, as in most international standards. Authors’ names must be presented in English. All publishing details (journal title, volume, issue, pages for journals; place of publication, publisher for books; titles of collections and collective monographs) must be given in English. Titles of journal articles, articles from conference proceedings, monographs, and chapters in collective works must be transliterated using https://translit.net/ru/mvd/(selecting the “MVD” option), https://qazlat.kz/ru Kazakh Cyrillic to Latin Alphabet Converter

4.2. Archival Sources

Archival sources are arranged in a separate numbered list according to endnotes – Ескертулер / Notes / Примечания (the title depending on the language of the article). In the text they appear as endnotes at the end of the article before the list of references. When describing archival documents, it is mandatory to indicate the title of the document (in the original language), the name of the archive, the fund number, the inventory number, the file number, and the total number of sheets in the document (in the language of the article).

  1. Manuscript Components:

5.1 Title Page: Indicate the type of publication (Research Article, Review Article, Research Note, Book Review, Biographical Article). Include the (CSCSTI) Code of State Categories Scientific and Technical Information (CSCSTI) index (https://nauka.kz/upload/files/43._GOST_7.77–98.pdf).

5.2 Article Title: The title of the article should accurately and unambiguously reflect its content. The title should be in bold font and justified without indentation. Reviews should have independent titles that do not duplicate the name of the reviewed work.

5.3 Author(s) Information: On the first page after the title of the article, the following should be indicated: the initials and surname of the author(s), then the place of work (study) without abbreviations, city and country (in italics), email address, and ORCID should be given as an email address: https://orcid.org (etc.).

5.4 Abstract: Not less than 300 and not more than 400 words. The abstract should contain: the subject, theme, and purpose of the work (indicated if they are not fully disclosed in the title); the methods of the work (described if they are new or of interest from the point of view of the work); the results of the work (the main results, author’s conclusions, and original discoveries are provided); the conclusions may be accompanied by recommendations, assessments, suggestions, and hypotheses described in the work. The abstract should avoid: phrases that duplicate the title of the work; general words, unnecessary introductory phrases (e.g., “the author of the article considers…”), complex grammatical constructions; well–known provisions; do not cite the names of previously published works. For reviews, comments, and personalities, the absence of this component is permitted.

5.5 Keywords: up to 10–12 separated by a semicolon (;). Key words should reflect the main content of the article and disclose the following aspects of the work: region, chronology, subject matter, special terminology. Key words should not be arranged in alphabetical order, but by degree of importance, separated by the punctuation mark "semicolon", at the end the punctuation mark "period" is not put.

5.6 Funding: If applicable, provide Individual registration number (IRN) and project name.

5.7 Author Contributions: Authors should briefly describe each author's contribution to the preparation and writing of the article using CREDIT, CRediT author statement.

5.8 Conflict of Interest Statement: Indicate any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If none, state: "The author declares no conflict of interest."

5.9 Acknowledgments: This section should mention the people who helped you with the article.

5.10 Illustrations: If the article contains illustrations, each of them must be presented both in the text and in a separate file in JPEG or TIFF format, 300 dpi. Text inside the figure – 8–9 font size. If the figure contains numbers or text, they must be typed in electronic form, not written by hand. Archival materials are an exception. Illustrations inserted into an MS Word or Excel file and not submitted as separate files will not be accepted.

5.11 The presented diagrams must be prepared in MS Excel. In this case, it is necessary to attach the tables based on which they were built along with the MS Excel diagrams. Alternative presentation options can be discussed separately during the review period.

5.12 A list of illustrations and captions to them is provided in the appendix to the article with the title “Illustrations”, “Diagrams”, “Tables”.

5.13 Language Requirements: Sections 5.2–5.9 and 5.12 must be provided in English, Russian, and Kazakh. The editorial team provides Kazakh translations for international authors. Literal translations should be avoided – texts must be understandable to the target audience.

5.14 References: Each article (except in English) in the journal is accompanied by a list of Latin sources. In order to ensure that citations are tracked in international databases, the editorial board recommends that authors provide information on the verified translation of cited sources into English (if available) in a separate list. The numbering of the sources must correspond to the numbering in the original author's version in Russian.

5.15 Author Information in Three Languages (English, Kazakh, Russian). Full name, academic degree, academic title, full institution name, address, postal code, ORCID, email.

5.16 References.

Each article (except those written in English) in the journal must be accompanied by a list of references transliterated into Latin script (see the rules for transliteration and translation of Kazakh texts from Cyrillic to Latin alphabet). To ensure citation tracking in international databases, the editorial board recommends that authors provide verified English translations of cited sources (if available) in a separate list. The alphabetical order of references in English must follow the English alphabet.

5.17 Archival Sources: In the Appendix, authors must provide the title of each document, the full name of the archive (subsequently abbreviated), the collection number (fond), inventory number (opis’), file number (delo), and page numbers (listy).

Templates and Examples:

 

Duties and Rights of Editors, Reviewers, and Authors

  1. General Provisions This section defines the rights, duties, and responsibilities of the editorial board, reviewers, and authors of the Gumilyov Journal of History in accordance with international standards of publication ethics (COPE, PERK), the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the editorial policy of the journal. All participants in the publication process are obliged to adhere to the principles of:
  • academic integrity;
  • transparency and honesty;
  • respect for intellectual property rights;
  • non-discrimination and avoidance of conflicts of interest;
  • compliance with open access and licensing policies (CC BY–NC–ND 4.0).
  1. Duties and Rights of Editors / Editorial Board 2.1 Duties of Editors and Editorial Board The editorial team (Editor-in-Chief, members of the editorial board, managing editors):
  • Manuscript Selection
    • Accept manuscripts relevant to the journal’s scope and thematic profile.
    • Evaluate submissions based on scholarly significance, novelty, reliability of data, clarity of presentation, and compliance with journal requirements.
    • Decide on peer review, revision, or rejection.
  • Neutrality and Non-Discrimination
    • Ensure decisions are independent of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, nationality, social status, institutional affiliation, or political views of authors.
  • Peer Review Organization
    • Guarantee double-blind peer review (anonymity of both author and reviewer).
    • Select competent reviewers with appropriate expertise.
    • When necessary, arrange additional reviews, including statistical or methodological evaluation.
    • Respect review deadlines and inform authors of outcomes.
  • Confidentiality
    • Safeguard the confidentiality of the review process and editorial correspondence.
    • Prevent the use of unpublished materials for personal benefit or disclosure to third parties.
  • Prevention of Misconduct
    • Take reasonable measures to detect and prevent plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data fabrication, and falsification.
    • Prohibit:
      • pseudo or contractual reviewing;
      • interference of intermediaries or “publication agencies”;
      • citation manipulation (artificial index inflation, excessive self-citation, irrelevant references);
      • publication of materials from pseudo-scientific or questionable conferences;
      • transfer of manuscripts to other journals without author consent.
    • Corrections and Retractions
      • Maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.
      • Publish corrections, clarifications, or retractions when necessary.
      • Retract articles in cases of plagiarism, falsification, duplicate publication, serious errors, or ethical violations.
      • Notify readers of retractions on the journal’s website and in subsequent issues.
    • Complaints and Conflicts
      • Address claims and disputes related to manuscripts and published materials.
      • Initiate additional review or refer issues to the editorial board when conflicts arise.
    • AI Policy
      • Monitor compliance with generative AI usage policy.
      • Require authors to disclose the fact and purpose of AI tool usage.
      • Prohibit listing AI systems (including ChatGPT) as co-authors.

2.2 Rights of Editors and Editorial Board Editors have the right to:

  • reject manuscripts not meeting journal scope, requirements, or ethical standards;
  • request revisions, clarifications, or additional information (including funding and conflict of interest statements);
  • send manuscripts for additional review;
  • reject or retract articles in case of violations;
  • edit style and academic language, with substantive changes agreed upon with authors;
  • establish and update author guidelines in line with evolving international standards.
  1. Duties and Rights of Reviewers 3.1 Duties of Reviewers A reviewer is an expert acting on behalf of the journal to conduct scholarly evaluation. Reviewers must:
  • Competence and Objectivity
    • Accept manuscripts only within their area of expertise.
    • Provide objective, reasoned evaluations, avoiding unfounded criticism or personal remarks.
    • Assess relevance, novelty, methodological soundness, clarity, structure, and appropriateness of publication.
  • Confidentiality
    • Maintain secrecy of manuscript content and review process.
    • Avoid discussing manuscripts with third parties without editorial permission.
    • Not use unpublished data for personal gain.
  • Integrity and Conflict of Interest
    • Inform the editorial office if unable to provide objective review due to conflicts of interest or insufficient expertise.
    • Report plagiarism, falsification, or duplicate publication.
    • Decline review if conflicts exist with authors or institutions.
  • Timeliness
    • Respect deadlines and promptly notify the editorial office if unable to complete review on time.

3.2 Rights of Reviewers Reviewers have the right to:

  • recommend publication, revision, additional review, or rejection with justification;
  • suggest specific corrections, clarifications, and references;
  • report ethical violations to the editorial office;
  • expect anonymity, respect for their expertise, and notification of final editorial decisions.
  1. Duties and Rights of Authors 4.1 Duties of Authors Authors submitting manuscripts to the Gumilyov Journal of History must:
  • Originality and Integrity
    • Submit original work not previously published or under review elsewhere.
    • Avoid plagiarism, self-plagiarism, unauthorized borrowing, data fabrication, or falsification.
  • Proper Referencing
    • Provide accurate and complete citations.
    • Properly reference archival and special sources per journal guidelines.
    • Obtain permissions for use of copyrighted materials.
  • Authorship and Contribution
    • Include only those who made significant scholarly contributions.
    • Approve the final version collectively.
    • Describe contributions according to CRediT taxonomy.
    • Avoid gift or fictitious authorship.
  • AI Usage
    • Disclose fact and purpose of generative AI tool usage.
    • Understand AI systems cannot be listed as authors.
  • Funding and Conflicts of Interest
    • Declare funding sources and conflicts of interest.
    • Acknowledge assistance received.
  • Editorial Interaction
    • Respond promptly to editorial and reviewer comments.
    • Provide reasoned explanations in case of disagreement.
    • Respect journal rights when republishing.
  • Error Correction
    • Notify the editorial office of significant errors post-submission or publication and cooperate in corrections or retractions.

4.2 Rights of Authors Authors have the right to:

  • fair, objective, and timely review;
  • confidentiality during editorial processing;
  • receive submission acknowledgment, review results, and anonymized reviewer comments;
  • present reasoned objections to reviewer/editorial decisions;
  • withdraw manuscripts during review;
  • self-archive preprints, review versions, accepted manuscripts, and final versions under CC BY–NC–ND 4.0 with citation;
  • use published articles for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution;
  • expect proper licensing, copyright protection, and transparent retraction procedures.

 

Appendix: Example of Manuscript Submission

SAMPLE ARTICLE FORMAT

Research Article

IRSTI 03.20.00

 

(14 кегль)

 

Digital History in Central Asia: Initiatives, Regional Specifics and Community

 

  1. Ashimovaа, G. Smolinb

аFriedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

b Russian University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia

аgaposfec03@mail.ru

 

(12 кегль)

 

Abstract: text text text text text texttext text text text text texttext text text text text texttext text text (12 кегль) не менее 300 не более 400

хххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххх

Keywords: digital humanities; digital history; 3D modelling of cultural heritage; community building 10-12 слов

 

Funding. The research was carried out within the framework of the project "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx”. under the programme of grant financing of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Project IRN: APxxxxxxx).

 

Орталық Азиядағы цифрлық тарих: бастамалар, аймақтық ерекшеліктер және қоғамдастық

 

Е. Ашимоваа, Г. Смолинb

а Александр Мюллер атындағы Эрланген-Нюрнберг Университеті, Германия

bРесей Гуманитарлық Университеті, Мәскеу, Ресей

 

Аңдатпа (не менее 300 не более 400 слов). Бұл мақалада Қазақстан, Қырғызстан және Өзбекстанға бағытталған Орталық Азиядағы цифрлық тарих саласындағы бастамалардың дамуы зерттеледі. Өңірдегі цифрлық гуманитарлық ғылымдар саласындағы сын-қатерлер, мүмкіндіктер мен үрдістер қарастырылады, мәдени мұраны зерттеу және сақтау үшін постколониялық перспективалар мен практикалық цифрлық әдістерді енгізудің маңыздылығы атап өтіледі. Зерттеу қазіргі цифрлық тарих жобаларын жан-жақты талдау үшін әдебиеттерге шолулар, сұхбаттар, сауалнамалар, далалық сапарлар және кейстерді қоса алғанда, аралас әдістемелік тәсілді қолданады. Орталық Азиядағы цифрлық гуманитарлық ғылымдардың өсуіне қарамастан, мақалада халықаралық форумдарда өкілдіктің жеткіліксіздігі, шектеулі ғылыми инфрақұрылымдар және батыстық немесе ресейлік көзқарастардың басым болуы сияқты кедергілер анықталды. Орталық Азиядағы цифрлық тарихшылар қауымдастығын дамытуға және оның қажеттіліктерін зерттеуге көп көңіл бөлінеді. Мақалада 3D сияқты инновациялық технологиялар арқылы тарихи әңгімелерді отарсыздандыру және мәдени мұраны сақтауды жақсарту үшін цифрлық гуманитарлық ғылымдардың әлеуеті көрсетілген.

Түйінді сөздер (10-12 слов). Сандық гуманитарлық ғылымдар; цифрлық тарих; тарих 3D мәдени мұраны модельдеу; қоғамдастық құру (точку не ставить)

 

Цифровая история в Центральной Азии: инициативы, региональная специфика и сообщество

 

Е. Ашимоваа, Г. Смолинb

аУниверситет Александра Мюллера Эрлангене-Нюрнберге, Германия

bРоссийский гуманитарный университет, Москва, Россия

 

Аннотация (не менее 300 не более 400 слов). В данной статье рассматривается развитие инициатив в области цифровой истории в Центральной Азии с акцентом на Казахстан, Кыргызстан и Узбекистан. В нем рассматриваются проблемы, возможности и тенденции в области цифровых гуманитарных наук в регионе, подчеркивается важность учета постколониальных перспектив и практических цифровых методов для исследований и сохранения культурного наследия. В исследовании используется смешанный подход, включающий обзоры литературы, интервью, опросы, посещение объектов и тематические исследования, чтобы обеспечить всесторонний анализ текущих проектов в области цифровой истории. Несмотря на рост цифровых гуманитарных наук в Центральной Азии, в статье выявлены такие препятствия, как недопредставленность на международных форумах, ограниченная исследовательская инфраструктура и преобладание западных или российских точек зрения. Значительное внимание уделяется развитию сообщества цифровой истории в Центральной Азии и изучению его потребностей. В статье подчеркивается потенциал цифровых гуманитарных наук в деколонизации исторических нарративов и улучшении сохранения культурного наследия с помощью инновационных средств, таких как 3D-технологии. В заключение подчеркивается важность разработки региональных рамок и укрепления сотрудничества для продвижения цифровой истории в Центральной Азии.

Ключевые слова (10-12): цифровые гуманитарные науки; цифровая история; 3D-моделирование культурного наследия; формирование сообщества (точку не ставить)

 

 

Text of the article in the language provided by the author (14 кегль)

 

Introduction.

Methods and materials.

Literary (historiographic) review

Results with indication of the author's thematic subsections.

Discussion.

Conclusion.

Acknowledgments in three languages

Notes

References

 

Information about authors

 

Elena A. Ashimova – researcher at the Chair of Modern and Eastern European History, Alexander Muller University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bismarckstr. 102, 91374, Erlangen, Germany, https://orcid.org/0001-0032-9727-3974, gaposfec03@mail.ru

Gennady I. Smolin ‒  Researcher, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Russian University for the Humanities, Tverskaya, 54/1, 010598, Moscow, Russia, https://orcid.org/0581-0102-5627-8774, smagi@mail.ru

 

Авторлар туралы мәліметтер

 

Елена Алексеевна Ашимова – Фридрих Александр атындағы Эрланген-Нюрнберг университетінің қазіргі және Шығыс Еуропа тарихы кафедрасының ғылыми қызметкері, Бисмарк көш. 12, 91054, Эрланген, Германия, https://orcid.org/0001-0032-9727-3974, gaposfec03@mail.ru

Геннадий Иванович Смолин ‒ ғылыми қызметкер, тарих ғылымдарының кандидаты, Ресей гуманитарлық университеті, Тверь, 54/1, 010598, Мәскеу, Ресей, https://orcid.org/0581-0102-5627-8774, smagi@mail.ru

 

Сведения об авторах

 

Елена Алексеевна Ашимова– научный сотрудник кафедры современной и восточно-европейской истории Университета Александра Мюллера Эрланген-Нюрнберг, ул. Бисмарка, 102, 91374, Эрланген, Германия, https://orcid.org/0001-0032-9727-3974, gaposfec03@mail.ru

Геннадий Иванович Смолин ‒ научный сотрудник, кандидат исторических наук, Российский гуманитарный университет, Тверская, 54/1, 010598, Москва, Россия, https://orcid.org/0581-0102-5627-8774, smagi@mail.ru

 

Authors contribution. in three languages

Conflict of Interest