Key discourses of Turkish Eurasianism

Research Article

Views: 13

Authors

Keywords:

Türkiye, West, East, Eurasia, Eurasianism, Kemalism, Nationalism, neo-Ottomanism, Islamism, pan-Turkism, pan-Turanism

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to explore Turkish Eurasianism, ascertaining and analyzing diverse types and concepts of Eurasianism in Türkiye. The objectives of the study are to examine theoretical, conceptual, and ideological origins and foundations of various types of Eurasianism in Türkiye and look into how they influence foreign policy course of Ankara, particularly in diverting the country away from the traditional unidimensional pro-Western Kemalist orientation and drifting it towards Eurasia by cultivating closer rapprochement and forging a strategic alliance with leading powers of the continent. The relevance and novelty of the topic are reflected in the in-depth critical analyses of the pertinent sources as well as in identifying the character and peculiarities of Eurasianist discourses in Türkiye. The results of the study have demonstrated that although Turkish Eurasianists are not a united political force and are not unanimous in foreign policy matters, to a certain degree they tend to exhibit anti-imperialist, anti-Western and counter-hegemonic attitudes. Adhering to anti-Western and more autonomous foreign policy course, Turkish Eurasianists tend to give a top priority for Ankara’s strategic independence from the West and its closer rapprochement with Russia, China, Turkic states and other countries in Greater Eurasia. Despite their ardent support and advocacy for a greater autonomy from the West and reorienting the country to Greater Eurasia, as domestic political movements they are rather marginal, holding limited sway over Türkiye’s internal and external policy. Therefore, to have a voice and a meaningful influence over Türkiye’s foreign policy course, Turkish Eurasianists are periodically forced to ally themselves with powerful political parties such as Erdoğan’s AK Party (AKP). Although Turkish Eurasianists consistently advocate for reorienting Türkiye to Eurasia, Ankara’s foreign policy is mostly determined by pragmatic approaches. From this perspective, although after the collapse of the bi-polar world order Türkiye has increasingly sought to cultivate a balanced international policy as a ‘middle power’, the nation’s full disengagement from the Western strategic security system has never been a priority for Türkiye. As Ankara is deeply integrated and embedded within the policy and security system of the West since the inception of the Cold War, Turkish policymakers have emphasized the strategic partnership with the Transatlantic alliance system, focusing on EU membership. 

Author Biographies

  • G. Zhumatay, Narxoz University

     Candidate of Historical Sciences, Assistant Professor

  • A. Yskak , Narxoz University

     Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor

  • Ya. Sari , Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

    PhD, Professor of International Politics at the Department of Political Science and International Relations, the Director of the Haydar Aliyev Center for Eurasian Studies

References

Balci B., Liles T. Turkey’s Comeback to Central Asia. Insight Turkey. 2018. Vol.20, no.4, рр.11‒26. http://doi.org/10.25253/99.2018204.06 (in English)

Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books. 1997. 201 р. (in English)

Cagaptay S. The Rise of Turkey. Herndon. VA: Potomac Books. 2014. 168 р. (in English)

Çolakoğlu S. The Rise of Eurasianism in Turkish Foreign Policy: Can Turkey Change its pro-Western Orientation? Middle East Institute. April 16, 2019. https://www.mei.edu/publications/rise-eurasianism-turkish-foreign-policy-can-turkey-change-its-pro-western-orientation (in English)

Davutoğlu A. Stratejik Derinlik. Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu [Strategic Depth: Turkey’s International Position]. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları. 2001. 584 р. (in Turkish)

Dugin A. Fundamentals of Geopolitics: Russia’s Geopolitical Future. Thinking in Space. Moscow: Arctogeya. 1997. 451 р. (in Russian)

Dugin A. Geopolitics of Russia. Moscow: Academic Project, Gaudeamus. 2012. 583 р. (in Russian)

Dunlop John B. Aleksandr Dugin’s Foundations of Geopolitics. Demokratizatsiya. January 31, 2004. No.12(1), рр.41‒57. Accessed December 29, 2022. https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/Geopolitics.pdf. (in English)

Ege A. Foreign policy as a means of the AKP’s struggle with Kemalism in relation to domestic variables. Turkish Studies. 2022. Vol.23(4), рр.554‒575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2066527 (in English)

Erşen E. The Return of Eurasianism in Turkey: Relations with Russia and Beyond. In: Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, edited by Emre Erşen and Seçkin Köstem. London: Routledge. 2019. Р. 31‒47. (in English)

Erşen E. Turkey and the Eurasian integration: Ideology or pragmatism? Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2022. Vol.22(1), рр.111‒125. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-111-125 (in English)

Evrensel E., Gönenç D., Ünlüsoy S. Turkey’s Political Parties’ Asia Policies: Visions, Contacts, Issues. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 2024. Vol.26(5), рр.768‒792. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2024.2308965 (in English)

Gurcan M. The rise of the Eurasianist vision in Turkey. Al-Monitor. May 17. 2017. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/05/turkey-rise-of-euroasianist-vision.html (in English)

Gürcan E. NATO’s “Globalized” Atlanticism and the Eurasian Alternative. Socialism and Democracy. 2013. Vol.27(2), рр.154‒167. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2013.795082 (in English)

Gürcan E. Imperialism after the Neoliberal Turn. London: Routledge. 2021. 156 р. (in English)

Gürpinar D. Historical Revisionism vs. Conspiracy Theories: Transformations of Turkish Historical Scholarship and Conspiracy Theories as a Constitutive Element in Transforming Turkish Nationalism. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 2013. Vol.15(4), рр.412‒433. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2013.844588 (in English)

Güzel S. Ulusalciliğin ontolojisini anlamak: sivil ve etnik milliyetçilikler bağlaminda bir analiz” [Understanding the Ontology of “Neo-Nationalism (Ulusalcilik): an Analysis in the Context of Civil and Ethnic Nationalism]. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2021. No.26, рр.29‒45. (in Turkish)

Karaosmanoǧlu A. The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey. Journal of International Affairs. 2000. Vol.54(1), рр.199‒216. (In English)

Kınıklıoğlu S. Eurasianism in Turkey. SWP Research Paper 7. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 2022. No.7, рр.5‒29. https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP07 (in English)

Kutlay M., Öniş Z. Understanding oscillations in Turkish foreign policy: pathways to unusual middle power activism. Third World Quarterly. 2021. Vol.42(12), рр.3051‒3069. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1985449 (in English)

Landau M. Pan-Turkism. From Irredentism to Cooperation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1995. (in English)

Nazarbayev N. Yevraziyskiy Soyuz: idei, praktika, perspektivy 1994‒1997 gg. [Eurasian Union: Ideas, Practice, Perspectives 1994‒1997]. Moscow. 1997. 480 р. (in Russian)

Moscow university offers new course covering ‘satanic Western civilisation’. Novaya Gazeta Europe. 2024. October 23. https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2024/10/23/moscow-university-offers-new-course-covering-satanic-western-civilisation-en-news (in English)

Perinçek M., Akçali E. Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey. Geopolitics. 2009. Vol.14(3), рр.550‒569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040802693564 (in English)

Perinçek D. Kürşat, Pekos Bill’in at uşağı olur mu? [Is Ankara a servant to the Atlantic, but an equal partner in Eurasia?]. Aydınlık, 2012. October 21. https://www.aydinlik.com.tr/haber/dogu-perincek-kursat-pekos-billin-at-usagi-olur-mu-tamami-154742 (in Turkish)

Sarı B. Culture of Insecurity and Production of Foreign Policy Crises: Turkey’s Sèvres Syndrome and Syrian Support for the PKK during the 1998 October Crisis. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 2021. Vol.24(1), рр.138‒157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.1992186 (in English)

Sevimlisoy A. Be very, very careful Mr. Putin ‒ Turkey also has nuclear weapons. Express. 2023. July 19. https://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/1792760/war-in-ukraine-putin-threat-to-ukraine-grain-turkey-nuclear-weapons (in English)

Tanrısever O. Discourses and Politics of Eurasianism in Turkey During the 2000s. In Turkey: Towards a Eurasian Shift? edited by Valeria Talbot. Ledizioni LediPublishing. 2018. рр.13‒33. (in English)

Taşpınar Ö. Turkey’s Middle East Policies: Between Neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism. Carnegie Papers, Carnegie Endowment. 2008. No.10, рр.1‒29. (in English)

Thom F. Eurasianism: A new Russian foreign policy? Uncaptive Minds. 1994. Vol.7(2), рр.65‒77. (in English)

Tufekci Ö. The Foreign Policy of Modern Turkey. Power and the Ideology of Eurasianism. London: I.B. Tauris. 2017a. (in English)

Tüfekçi Ö. Turkish Eurasianism: Roots and Discourses. In: Eurasian Politics and Society: Issues and Challenges, edited by Özgür Tüfekçi, Hüsrev Tabak and Erman Akıllı. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2017b. Р. 1‒35. (In English)

Tüysüzoğlu G. Strategic Depth: A Neo-Ottomanist Interpretation of Turkish Eurasianism. Mediterranean Quarterly. 2014. Vol.25(2), рр.85-104. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-2685776 (in English)

Tüysüzoğlu G. Turkey’s Return to Eurasianism: Is It Real or Just a Pragmatic Discourse? In: The Return of Eurasia. Edited by Glenn Diesen and Alexander Lukin. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. Рр. 185‒223. (in English)

Tüysüzoğlu G. The Eurasianist Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy after the Coup Attempt: An Evaluation in the Context of the SCO. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies 2023. Vol.17(1), рр. 83‒105. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2023.2190611 (in English)

Williams M., Neumann I. From alliance to security community: NATO, Russia and the power of identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2000. Vol.29(2), рр.357‒387. (in English)

Yavuz H. Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge University Press. 2009. 301 р. (in English)

Yavuz H. The motives behind the AKP’s foreign policy: neo-Ottomanism and strategic autonomy. Turkish Studies. 2022. Vol.23(5), рр.659‒680. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2100700 (In English)

Yilmaz Y., Bilgin P. Constructing Turkey’s Western” Identity during the Cold War: Discourses of the Intellectuals of Statecraft. International Journal. 2006. Vol.61(1), рр.39‒59. (in English)

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Zhumatay, G., et al. “Key Discourses of Turkish Eurasianism: Research Article”. Gumilyov Journal of History , vol. 150, no. 1, Apr. 2025, https://jhistory.enu.kz/index.php/jHistory/article/view/9.