The Historical and Ideological Origins of Turkish Nationalism: Research Article

G. Zhumatay; Ya.  Sari; А. Yskak

doi:10.32523/3080-129X-2026-154-1-76-93

Authors

G. Zhumatay Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-8538
Ya. Sari Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Türkiye Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-6600
А. Yskak Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-584X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-129X-2026-154-1-76-93

Keywords:

Nationalism , Ottomanism, Turkishness, Islam, Secularism, Kemalism, Ottoman Empire, Türkiye, Westernization

Abstract

The paper explores the historical and ideological origins and theoretical underpinnings of Turkish nationalism in the late Ottoman period and the early republican era. The study draws on relevant sources and literature on the topic and builds on underlying theories of nationalism and identity studies. Under Ottoman rule, the multiethnic and multireligious populations of the empire were bound by their belonging to the common homeland, the Ottoman nation, and the ideology of Ottomanism, regardless of their ethnic origins. However, the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the rise of Greek, Armenian, Serbian, and other minority nationalisms led to the decline of Ottomanism as the hegemonic ideology. This process also induced the emergence of Turkish nationalism. The genesis and promotion of Turkish nationalism and Turkishness by Ottoman intellectuals at the end of the 19^th century led to the erosion of Ottomanism. The transition from the Ottoman era into the republican period was marked by the nationalization of Turkish society. The nation-building project implemented by Mustafa Kemal and his followers aimed to transform Turkish society from a traditional and Islamic society into a secular, modern, progressive, and Western one. The results of the study have shown that the establishment of the Republic of Türkiye was not a mere transition from one period to another, but the inception of crafting a new nation premised on Turkishness. The Kemalists focus more on creating a unified national identity by Turkifying Muslim ethnic groups, while maintaining separate identities for Christian and other religious minorities. The results of the study have also indicated that Kemalist nationalism has pursued a policy of displacing and marginalizing the Ottoman past and Islam. Furthermore, the study shows that alongside the dominant Kemalist nationalist discourse, Turkish society also hosts other competing and overlapping nationalist ideologies and political groups. This is particularly evident in the emergence of non-Kemalist discourses and the rise of the AKP to power. The ascent of the AKP has indicated the persistence of alternative nationalist ideologies and discourses that were displaced and suppressed by the Kemalists, specifically Ottomanism, which has become a powerful discourse in both domestic and foreign policy in Türkiye.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

G. Zhumatay, Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Assistant Professor, School of Law and Public Policy
Ya. Sari , Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Türkiye

PhD, Professor of International Politics, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Director of Haydar Aliyev Center for Eurasian Studies
А. Yskak, Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, School of Arts and Social Sciences

References

Akçura Y. Three Types of Policy. Ankara: TT Kurumu Yayınları. 1976. 55 p.

Akıllı E. State Identity and Foreign Policy in Turkey. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. 2013. 189 p.

Aktar A., Kızılyürek N., Özkırımlı U. Introduction. In: Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle. Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. Edited by Ayhan Aktar, Niyazi Kızılyürek, Umut Özkırımlı. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2010. Pp.xiii–xxiii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297326

Aktar A. Conversion of a ‘Country’ into a ‘Fatherland’: The Case of Turkification Examined, 1923-1934. In: Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle. Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. Edited by Ayhan Aktar, Niyazi Kızılyürek, Umut Özkırımlı. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2010. Pp.21‒35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297326_2

Atay F. Çankaya. 6. Edition, Istanbul: Pozitif Yayınevi. 2023. 591 p.

Aydemir Ş. The Man Who Searched for Water. 59. Edition, Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. 2024. 408 p.

Aydin S. The Use and Abuse of Archaeology and Anthropology in Formulating the Turkish Nationalist Narrative. In: Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle. Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. Edited by Ayhan Aktar, Niyazi Kızılyürek, Umut Özkırımlı. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2010. Pp.36-46.

Bali R. The Politics of Turkification during the Single Party period. In: Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities. Edited by Hans-Lukas Kieser. London – New York: I.B. Tauris. 2006. Pp.43-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608010.ch-005

Biran M. The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 2005. 279 p.

Bozarslan H. Kemalism, Westernization and Anti-liberalism. In: Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities. Edited by Hans-Lukas Kieser. London – New York: I.B. Tauris.2006. Pp.28-34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608010.ch-003

Buçukçu Ö. Nationalism: History, Theory, and Fundamental Issues. Istanbul: Ketebe Kitabevi. 2020. 220 p.

Çalen M. The Emergence of Turkish Nationalism According to Yusuf Akçura and Ziya Gökalp, and a Proposal for Periodization of the Emergence Period of Turkish Nationalism. Milliyetçilik Araştırmaları Dergisi. Spring. 2019. No.1(1), рp.1-16.

Çolak Y. Nationalism and the State in Turkey: Drawing the Boundaries of ‘Turkish Culture’ in the 1930s. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2003. Vol.3, no.1, pp.1–19. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2003.tb00034.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2003.tb00034.x

Çolak Y. Ottomanism vs. Kemalism: Collective Memory and Cultural Pluralism in 1990s Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies. 2006. July. Vol.42, no.4, pp.587-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200600642274

Dinç P. Hünler O. Introduction by the Editors. In: The Republic of Turkey and its Unresolved Issues. P. Dinç and O. Hünler (eds.). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 2025. Pp.1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1583-4_1

Erimtan C. “Hittites, Ottomans and Turks: Ağaoğlu Ahmed Bey and the Kemalist construction of Turkish nationhood in Anatolia”. Anatolian Studies. 2008. Vol.58, рp.141–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154600008711

Foss C. “Kemal Atatürk: Giving a New Nation a New History”. Middle Eastern Studies. 2014. Vol.50, no.5, pp.826-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2014.913574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2014.913574

Georgeon F. The Origins of Turkish Nationalism: Yusuf Akçura (1876-1935). Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. 1996. 226 p.

Gökalp Z. Becoming Turkish, Becoming Islamic, Becoming Modern. Istanbul: Toker Yayınları. 1988. 80 p.

Golden P. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State Formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Gôttingen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 1992. 483 p.

Gürpinar D. Ottoman/Turkish Visions of the Nation, 1860-1950. Palgrave MacMillan. 2013. 308 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334213

Hanioğlu Ş. Preparation for a Revolution: The Young Turks, 1902-1908. New York: Oxford University Press. 2001. 273 p.

Hanioğlu S. Turkism and the Young Turks, 1889-1908. In: Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities. Edited by Hans-Lukas Kieser. London – New York: I.B. Tauris. 2006. Pp.3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608010.ch-001

Hanioğlu Ş. Ataturk: An Intellectual Biography. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 2011. 273 p.

Heywood A. Political Ideologies. An Introduction. 7th edition. Red Globe Press: Macmillan International. 2021. 292 p.

Kadioğlu A. The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity. Middle Eastern Studies. 1996. Vol.32, no.2, pp.177-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209608701110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209608701110

Kaldellis A. The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium. New York: Oxford University Press. 2023. 1133 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197549322.001.0001

Meram A. History of Turkism and Turkist Struggles. Istanbul: Kültür Kitabevi. 1969. 262 p.

Özdoğan G. From “Turan” to “Gray Wolf”: Turkish Nationalism During the One-Party Period (1931-1946). I. Kaplan (trans.). 5. Edition. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 2019. 352 p.

Özdoğan G. “Turkish Nationalism Reconsidered: The ‘Heaviness’ of Statist Patriotism in Nation-Building”. In: Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle. Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. Edited by Ayhan Aktar, Niyazi Kızılyürek, Umut Özkırımlı. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2010. Pp.47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297326_4

Kieser H-L. Introduction. In: Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities. Ed. by Hans-Lukas Kieser. London – New York: I.B. Tauris. 2006a. Pp.vii–xvii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608010

Kieser H-L. An Ethno-nationalist Revolutionary and Theorist of Kemalism: Dr Mahmut Esat Bozkurt (1892-1943). In: Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities. Ed. by Hans-Lukas Kieser. London – New York: I. B. Tauris. 2006b. Pp.20–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608010.ch-002

Parla T. Ziya Gökalp, Kemalism and Corporatism in Turkey. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 1993. 232 p.

Saray M. Atatürk’s Understanding of Turkishness and Nationalism. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. 2022. 219 p.

Tokdoğan N. Neo-Ottomanism and the Politics of Emotions in Turkey: Resentment, Nostalgia, Narcissism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2024. 183 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48723-1

Uyanık M. Three Styles of Politics: Turkishness as a Design of a Superordinate Identity. Istanbul: Metropol Yayınları. 2003.147p.

Uzer U. An Intellectual History of Turkish Nationalism Between Turkish Ethnicity and Islamic Identity. Salt Lake City: UUtah Press. 2016. 261 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book46323

Uzer U. Conservative Narrative: Contemporary Neo-Ottomanist Approaches in Turkish Politics. Middle East Critique. 2020. Vol.29, no.3, pp.275-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770444

Zeydanlıoğlu W. The white Turkish man’s burden; Orientalism, Kemalism and the Kurds in Turkey. In: Neocolonial Mentalities in Contemporary Europe? Language and Discourse in the Construction of Identities. Edited by Guido Rings and Anne Ife. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2008. Pp.155–174.

Zürcher E. Ottoman Sources of Kemalist Thought. In: Late Ottoman Society: The Intellectual Legacy. Edited by Elisabeth Özdalga. London: Routledge Curzon. 2005. Pp.14–27.

Zürcher E. The Young Turk Legacy and Nation Building. From the Ottoman Empire to Atatürk’s Turkey. New Work: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd. 2010. 351 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755610761

Zürcher E. Young Turk Governance in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War. Middle Eastern Studies. 2019a. Vol.55, no.6, pp.897-913. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2019.1590820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2019.1590820

Zürcher E. The Young Turk revolution: comparisons and connections. Middle Eastern Studies. 2019b. Vol.55, no.4, pp.481–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2019.1566124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2019.1566124